Druschke, Caroline Gottschalk, Eric G. Booth, & Emma Lundberg (in press). Q-rhetoric and controlled equivocation: Revising “the scientific study of subjectivity” for cross-disciplinary collaboration. Technical Communication Quarterly. (doi: 10.1080/10572252.2019.1583377) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572252.2019.1583377)

Abstract: This article offers a revision to an existing social science methodology, Q methodology, through “Q-Rhetoric.” After detailing Q methodology’s theoretical underpinnings and practical method, and persistent critiques of the methodology, the article employs perspectives from rhetorical theory and Amerindian anthropology to suggest a methodological correction. It concludes by detailing the use of Q-Rhetoric to intervene in a Wisconsin stream management controversy, proposing Q-Rhetoric as a pragmatic and theoretically sound methodology for working across disciplinary divides.

Caroline Gottschalk Druschke <caroline.gottschalk.druschke@wisc.edu> is in the Department of English, University of Wisconsin-Madison, where she fuses rhetorical and ecological perspectives to intervene in controversies over freshwater streams.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.