Hammami, Muhammad M., Safa Hammami, Reem Aboushaar, & Ahmed S Aljomah (2019). Lay people’s ethical attitudes to placebo treatment: A Q-methodology study. Patient Preference and Adherence, 13, 1599-1617.
Abstract: Background: Placebo-treatment acceptability is debated among ethicists, mostly due to conﬂict between respect-to-autonomy and beneﬁcence principles. It is not clear how lay people balance these and other ethical principles. Methods: One hundred and eighty-seven respondents rank-ordered 42 opinion statements covering various ethical aspects of placebo-treatment, according to a 9-category symmetrical distribution. We analyzed statements’ scores using averaging-analysis and by-person factor analysis (Q-methodology). Results: Respondents’ mean (SD) age was 34.6 (10.6) years, 54% were women, 40% healthcare-related, 68% Muslims (31% Christians), and 39% received general education in Saudi Arabia (24% in the Philippines). On averaging-analysis, the most-agreeable statements were “Acceptable if beneﬁt to patient large” and “Acceptable with physician intent to beneﬁt patient”. The most-disagreeable statements were “Acceptable with physician self-beneﬁt intent” and “Acceptable with large harm to other patients”. Muslims gave a higher rank to “Giving no description is acceptable”, “Acceptable with small beneﬁt to patient”, and “Acceptable with physician intent to beneﬁt patient” and a lower rank to “Acceptable to describe as inactive drug”, “Acceptable with physician intent to please patient caring relative”, and “Acceptable with moderate harm to other patients” (p<0.01). Q-methodology detected several ethical attitude models that were mostly multi-principled and consequentialism-dominated. The majority of Christian and Philippines-educated women loaded on a “relatively family and deception-concerned” model, whereas the majority of Muslim and Saudi Arabia-educated women loaded on a “relatively common-good-concerned” model. The majority of Christian and healthcare men loaded on a “relatively deception-concerned” model, whereas the majority of Muslim and non-healthcare men loaded on a “relatively motives-concerned” model. Of nine intent-related statements, ≥2 received extreme rank on averaging-analysis and in 100% of women and men models. Conclusion: 1) On averaging-analysis, patient’s beneﬁcence (consequentialism) followed by physician’s intent (virtue ethics) were more important than deception (respect-to-autonomy). 2) Q-methodology identiﬁed several ethical attitude models that were mostly multiprincipled and associated with respondents’ demographics.
Muhammad M Hammami <muhammad> is in the Clinical Studies and Empirical Ethics Department, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, and Alfaisal University College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
You must log in to post a comment.