Q Bibliography: Harris et al. on program evaluation

Harris, Kevin, Chad Oatley, Steven Mumford, Phung K. Pham, & Heather Nunns (2021, July). Introducing Q methodology to program evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation. (ePub in advance of print) (doi: 10.1177/1098214020932227) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020932227) Abstract: This method note presents Q methodology as a useful tool for evaluators to add to their practice toolbox. Q methodology, which… Read More

Q Bibliography: Workman et al. on suicide prevention research gaps

Workman, Don E., Dawn M. Bellanti, Marija S. Kelber, Erin H. Beech, Derek Smolenski, Nigel E. Bush, Amanda Edwards‐Stewart, Nancy Skopp, Jean L. Otto, Abigail L. Garvey Wilson, Maria A. Morgan, Suman Ojha, & Bradley E. Belsher (2021, July). A systematic analysis and prioritization of suicide prevention research gaps. Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. (ePub in… Read More

Q Bibliography: Leonhardt, Braito, & Uehleke on combining methodologies in an agri-environmental scheme

Leonhardt, Heidi, Michael Braito, & Reinhard Uehleke (2021, June). Combining the best of two methodological worlds? Integrating Q methodology‑based farmer archetypes in a quantitative model of agri‑environmental scheme uptake. Agriculture and Human Values. (Link: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-021-10242-w) (Open Access: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-021-10242-w) Abstract: Increasing farmers’ acceptance and adoption of environmentally beneficial farming practices is essential for mitigating negative impacts… Read More

Q Bibliography: Sukk & Siibak on caring dataveillance and good parenting

Sukk, Marit, & Andra Siibak (2021, July). Caring dataveillance and the construction of “good parenting”: Estonian parents’ and pre-teens’ reflections on the use of tracking technologies. Communications: The European Journal of Communication Research. (ePub in advance of print) (doi: 10.1515/commun-2021-0045) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2021-0045) Abstract: Digital parenting tools, such as child-tracking technologies, play an ever-increasing role in… Read More

Q Bibliography: Caruso & Fraschini on vision of Italian L2 students

Caruso, Marinella, & Nicola Fraschini (2021, July). A Q methodology study into vision of Italian L2 university students: An Australian perspective. Modern Language Journal. (ePub in advance of print) (doi: 10.1111/modl.12713) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12713) Abstract: This study explores language learners’ motivation from the perspective of vision, a concept that has specifically been identified as one of… Read More

Q Bibliography: Louah & Visser on multi-actor innovation networks performance

Louah, Line, & Marjolein Visser (2016, July). Q methodology, a useful tool to foster multi-actor innovation networks performance. Read at a meeting of the International Farming Systems Association, Newport, UK. (Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318210942_Q_Methodology_a_useful_tool_to_foster_multi-actor_innovation_networks_performance) Abstract: We address in this paper opportunities of Q Methodology for empirical agricultural innovation studies. In the systems perspective on innovation, multi-actor innovation… Read More

Q Bibliography: Buckova & Dostal on curriculum of informatics and digital technologies (book)(Czech)

Bučková, Hana, & Jiří Dostál (2020, December). Kurikulum informatiky a digitálních technologií z pohledu učitelů 2. stupně základních škol [Curriculum of informatics and digital technologies from the point of view of primary school teachers]. Olomouc, Czech Republic: Palacký University. 205 pp. ISBN (print) 978-80-244-5903-5, ISBN (online: PDF) 978-80-244-5904-2. (Czech) English Abstract: The aim of the… Read More

Q Bibliography: Fraschini & Park on anxiety in language teachers

Fraschini, Nicola, & Hyunjin Park (2021, May). Anxiety in language teachers: Exploring the variety of perceptions with Q methodology. Foreign Language Annals. (ePub in advance of print) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12527) Abstract: The negative effects of anxiety on teachers’ lives, classroom practice, and student learning have highlighted the importance of this emotion for the language teaching field.… Read More

Q Bibliography: Kim et al. on practitioner perspectives on infrastructure resilience

Kim, Yeowon, Nancy B. Grimm, Mikhail V. Chester, & Charles L. Redman (2021, June). Capturing practitioner perspectives on infrastructure resilience using Q-methodology. Environmental Research: Infrastructure and Sustainability. (ePub in advance of print) (doi: 10.1088/2634-4505/ac0f98) (Link: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2634-4505/ac0f98) (Open Access: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2634-4505/ac0f98/pdf) Abstract: In many disciplines, the resilience concept has applied to managing perturbations, challenges, or shocks in… Read More

Q Bibliography: Boilson et al. on evaluation of health data user framework

Boilson, Andrew, Stephanie Gauttier, Regina Connolly, Paul Davis, Justin Connolly, Dale Weston, & Anthony Staines (2019). Q-method evaluation of a European health data analytic end user framework (September 12, 2019). 2019 ENTRENOVA Conference Proceedings, 12-14 September 2019, pp. 219-231. Rovinj, Croatia. SSRN Electronic Journal [Social Science Research Network]. (doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3490516) (Link: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3490516) (Access: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3490516) (Conference… Read More