Q Bibliography: Fang & Chen on the entrepreneurial intentions of science and engineering students

Fang, Chen, & Liwen Chen (2019). Exploring the entrepreneurial intentions of science and engineering students in China: A Q methodology study. Sustainability, 11, art. 2751. 16 pp. (doi: 10.3390/su11102751) Abstract: The entrepreneurial intentions of Chinese students have received rapidly evolving attention, with the “mass entrepreneurship and innovation” program as a driving force, which encourages individuals… Read More

Q Bibliography: Deicer-Brown, Alfaro, & Milne on mangroves in New Zealand

Dencer-Brown, Amrit Melissa, Andrea C. Alfaro, & Simon Milne (2019, May). Muddied waters: Perceptions and attitudes towards mangroves and their removal in New Zealand. Sustainability, 11(9), art. 2631, 33 pp. (Open access) (doi: 10.3390/su11092631) (Link: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/11/9/2631) Abstract: Seaward expansion of New Zealand’s mangrove Avicennia marina (subsp.) australasica in estuaries has led to disparity in opinion… Read More

Q Bibliography: Stickl Haugen, Morris, & Wester on the need to belong in middle school

Stickl Haugen, Jaimie, Carrie Wachter Morris, & Kelly L. Wester (2019, February). The need to belong: An exploration of belonging among urban middle school students. Journal of Child and Adolescent Counseling, 5(1), 1-17. (doi: 10.1080/23727810.2018.1556988) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1080/23727810.2018.1556988) Abstract: This study explored the subjective perspectives of the affective, behavioral, and familial dimensions of belonging among urban… Read More

Q Bibliography: Kotuľáková on teachers’ beliefs and science education

Kotuľáková, Katarína (2019, April). Identifying teachers’ beliefs prior to CPD training focusing on an inquiry-based approach in science education. Research in Science Education. (ePub in advance of print) (doi: 10.1007/s11165-019-9841-0) Abstract: Teachers bring with them a variety of beliefs when they arrive at continual professional development (CPD) training courses focusing on the inquiry-based approach to… Read More

Q Bibliography: Chang et al. on BIPV technologies and innovation policy

Chang, Ruidong, Yuan Cao, Yujie Lu, & Veronika Shabunko (2019). Should BIPV technologies be empowered by innovation policy mix to facilitate energy transitions?-–Revealing stakeholders’ different perspectives using Q methodology. Energy Policy, 129, 307-318. Abstract: As new renewable energy applications, building-integrated photovoltaics (BIPV) systems have significant potential to facilitate energy transitions towards renewable energy in highly… Read More

Q Bibliography: Dune et al. on sexual and reproductive health

Dune, Tinashe, Janette Perz, Zelalem Mengesha, & David Ayika (2017). Culture clash? Investigating constructions of sexual and reproductive health from the perspective of 1.5 generation migrants in Australia using Q methodology. Reproductive Health, 14, art. 50, 13 pp. (Open access) (doi: 10.1186/s12978-017-0310-9) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-017-0310-9) Abstract: Background: In Australia, those who migrate as children or adolescents… Read More

Q Bibliography: McNicholas & Cotton on marine plastic waste management

McNicholas, Grace, & Matthew Cotton (in press). Stakeholder perceptions of marine plastic waste management in the United Kingdom. Ecological Economics. Abstract: Plastic pollution is a significant threat to the marine environment. Although scientific interest in the environmental impacts of plastic pollution has grown rapidly over the last decade, there has been a relative lag in… Read More

Q Bibliography: Banasick on a new desktop application for Q analysis

Banasick, Shawn (2019). KADE: A desktop application for Q methodology. JOSS: Journal of Open Source Software, 4(36), art. 1360. (Link: https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01360) Summary: KADE is a desktop application for analyzing Q methodology data that operates on Microsoft Windows, Apple macOS, and Linux systems. Features not included in other open source packages include interactive visualizations that facilitate… Read More

Q Bibliography: Dune et al. on Q in health social sciences

Dune, Tinashe, Zelalem Mengesha, Valentina Buscemi, & Janette Perz (2019). Jumping the methodological fence: Q methodology. In Pranee Liamputtong (Ed.), Handbook of research methods in health social sciences (pp. 751-768). Singapore: Springer. (doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5251-4_101) Abstract: Mixed methods research is consistently used quantitatively and qualitatively to understand and explore the many facets of a range of… Read More

Q Bibliography: Bertuol-Garcia et al. on the science-practice interface in ecology and conservation

Bertuol‐Garcia, Diana, Carla Morsello, Charbel N. El‐Hani, & Renata Pardini (2018). Shared ways of thinking in Brazil about the science–practice interface in ecology and conservation. Conservation Biology. (ePub in advance of print) (Link: https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13242) Abstract: The debate in the literature on the science–practice interface suggests a diversity of opinions on how to link science and… Read More